Free Liberal

Coordinating towards higher values

Lipstick on a Bailout

by Ron Paul

This time last week, the biggest bailout in the history of the world seemed to be a fait accompli. Last weekend, the Fed Chairman and the Secretary of the Treasury had harsh words of doom and gloom for Congressional leaders, with the rest of the administration parroting along, and by last Monday it seemed both parties were about to fall in line and vote our Republic away by socializing the banking industry through this bailout.

Foolish business behavior was about to be rewarded, and propped up a little longer, the bubble blown a little bigger, and our coming Depression made that much greater, but then something happened on the way to the House floor.

Citizens made their voices heard.

The real story behind the story in Congress this week was the thousands of calls and emails sent to Representatives, clogging up inboxes and even slowing down the House internet system. Slowly, like the Titanic turning around, sentiments on the Hill shifted, and we heard Congressmen capitulating and changing their tune a little, desperately trying to find ways to salvage the bailout without completely enraging their constituencies.

Now we hear about taxpayer protections, about golden parachutes, and about other nuances that hardly cover up the fact that we would be creating more money out of thin air and further devaluing the dollar! The problem is not HOW the government is spending this money; its the fact that the government is spending this money. We dont have it. We are already nearly $10 trillion in debt, not including unfunded liabilities. We already spend about $1 trillion a year we dont have on our overseas empire. Now nearly $1 trillion more is somehow supposed to magically appear and solve all our problems! No creating more money might delay the inevitable for some well-connected banks on Wall Street, but in a few weeks we will find ourselves right back in this same position, but much poorer.

The unfortunate thing is that weve already spent at least $700 billion on other bailouts that did not solve the problem. And while all this negotiation was taking place, the auto industry was quietly bailed out, with no controversy, no discussion, to the tune of $25 billion.

Inevitably, it appears Congress will call their constituents bluff and the bailout will pass, because that is the habit Wall Street and Washington have fallen into. People are right to be concerned about our financial future. Ive been talking for 30 some years about reasons we need to be concerned and change our ways. We find ourselves now in a position of no good options, and no silver bullets. But the worst thing we can do is to compound our problems by intensifying the mistakes of the past. We do have tough economic times ahead, no doubt, no matter what we do, even if we do nothing. The question, is will we have the courage to take our medicine now and get it over with, or will we prolong the misery for many years to come? Im less and less optimistic about the answer to that question.

Dr. Paul is a Republican congressman from Texas.


« With the Congress not in session, the stock market made a big comeback today. See, that's the key to saving the economy. Send these idiots home so they can't screw up anymore. Exactly. We need more holidays. That's the problem. More holidays, Jewish, Chr | Main | Bedbugs in their Bonnets »

Comments

The question arises as to whether the proposed Rescue Package aka Bailout is constitutional and appropriate.

As to the first question, it is about as constitutional as the creation of a national bank. Strict constructionists will say no, others will say yes. It seems to fall under the necessary and proper clause and the ability to coin money and regulate interstate commerce. I don't think Messrs. Hamilton and Madison would disagree with it.

As to whether it is appropriate - as I see it there are two kinds of bad mortgage securities. The first are the securities where the underlying properties are under water but payments are still being made. These do not look good on the books, because if the asset were to be sold, the debt would not be covered. My mortgage is like that. Having the government buy and hold these will offload risk on the taxpayers, free up capital, and eventually lead to a profit as these mortgages are either paid off or the property values increase to over the debt load. Of course, if a Land Value Tax were initiated at this point the value of the property would never recover and the government would take a loss. This is one of those situations where if you're in for a penny with the financial system, you're in for a pound.

The second circumstance are foreclosed properties. These will only recover if by some miracle the property was not vandalized AND the tracts where the property was foreclosed is not mostly in foreclosure. Some swatches of Cleveland will never recover their value. In this case, only the federal government has the wherewithall to buy up all the traunches on these properties and repackage them into geographic packages so that the actual real property may be disposed of - probably either by sale at auction or by changing the usage to something besides housing - in which case the appropriate action would be to transfer tracts of land back to the state or local government for redevelopment or for non-development. If this happens, the loss will be permanent. When it becomes apparant that this will happen more than we think, the taxpayer protections in the bill will need to be modified to allow a loss on these cases. If the land is transferred to local governments or redevelopment authorities, such loss would serve a public purpose (although we can debate this below).

Either way, the bailout should happen and should happen soon. Of course, I am no McCain fan since he hired the Rovists who are having him go nasty. If the House GOP does not back his play, he will be perceived as inneffective legislatively and will be lucky to win Arizona.

# posted at by Michael Bindner

Update - it passed.

# posted at by Michael Bindner

Michael Bindner,
I find your apologia for the bailout unconvincing. If some areas in Cleveland will *never* recover their former value, then that's probably because the "value" was inflated by real-estate speculation. While I think that some forms of speculation must simply be borne, because I believe in the right of individuals to buy and sell as they see fit, I think a site value tax would go a long way to reducing real-estate speculation. As for the current crisis, the bailout is a mistake. Comparisons to the great depression are, at best, misleading. We're not even really in a recession at present. Additionally, the recession that turned into a depression was worsened by tax hikes and protectionism enacted by the government in the wake of the original disaster. If you don't believe, look at the increase in taxes under the Hoover administration, and the Smoot-Hawley tariff bill, of course.

# posted at by Will

That still doesn't change the fact that if you have a mortgage, an LVT will permanently put your land values under water.

The Cleveland area lost jobs, and with it population. If the jobs had stayed, the homes would still be occupied. The bailout will hopefully address how these homes are best liquidated. Like it or not, only the feds have the deep pockets to reconsolidate the debt on these homes so that the property can be disposed of.

Its water under the bridge anyway - the bill passed.