Free Liberal

Coordinating towards higher values

The Color of Boom and Bust

by Paul Jacob

You've heard of "green collar jobs." But what about "glass collar jobs"?

The Heartland Institute just put out a handy little pamphlet called "The Cap and Trade Handbook," by James M. Taylor. It debunks various aspects of today's obsession with fixing the global climate by laying on new restrictions, regulations and taxes. On page 5, Taylor addresses, colorfully, the "green jobs" issue.

Would cap-and-trade create new jobs? The handbook says, "sure, forcing people to buy expensive alternative energy means some new jobs would be created in the wind and solar industry. But even more jobs would be *destroyed* in the more efficient conventional energy sectors. . . ."

True -- new jobs would come at a cost. The pamphlet then considers what would happen if the government hired thugs to break our windows. Sure, "such a program would create a lot of new 'glass collar' jobs in the window repair industry." But employment would not increase on net, and we'd obviously be worse off, not better.

Unfortunately, the big headline on the page insists that "There will be no employment boom in the 'green collar' jobs sector." Not true, as explained.

Just as subsidizing mortgages led to a housing boom this past decade, cap-and-trade policy would likely create a new boom industry that also would not sustain itself. And then explode. Spectacularly. Disastrously.

Financial bubbles break. That's bad, no matter what color.

Paul Jacob's "Common Sense" is published by the Citizens in Charge Foundation. Their website can be visited at www.citizensincharge.org.


« End the Mandate | Main | Financial Reform: The good, the bad, and the smugly »

Comments

The claim that more jobs would be destroyed than created makes no sense. The energy markets have shown themselves to be fairly elastic with regard to price, so even if the price of energy goes up significantly demand is unlike to drop by a large amount. So, if as you claim the alternative forms of energy are significantly less efficient and if people are still using essentially the same amount of energy, it would seem likely that the number of people employed by green energy would far outweigh the number thrown out of work in conventional energy.

# posted at by Miko

Cap and Trade is dead for the year, if not forever. It will quiety go the way of the BTU tax.

Financial disincentives for environmental good behavior don't really work as well as the inventiveness of new technology or the scandal of a nice environmental disaster.

Devotees of Edgar Cayce likely suspect that only the latter will end the addiction to carbon, since Cayce predicts Cali will fall into the sea and much of Dixie will be under water due to global warming. Of course, this was supposed to occur 15 years ago, so the prediction looks less and less likely to come true.

Helium 3 fusion powering homes and electric cars will cure our dependence on oil and coal (not not gas) - however as long as there is oil available, progress on developing Helium 3 will be slow.

# posted at by Michael Bindner