I remain part of the Ron Paul revolution. That said, of the three candidates left, I think Obama is the least evil. Justin Raimondo over at Antiwar.com expressed that sentiment in a new article.
Why should Free Liberals choose Obama? First and foremost, unlike Hillary he opposed the Iraq War from the outset and at least represents a somewhat different perspective on foreign policy that is not so doctrinaire and beholden to the War Party. Also, his health care proposal is not quite as repressive as Clinton's. Lastly, even though many of his supporters may be ignorant of the matter, Obama does have a major legislative accomplishment to his name (pro-freedom transparency legislation that he co-sponsored with Sen. Coburn). What has Hillary done?
Will the establishment strangle Obama's candidacy as it did Dean's candidacy 4 years ago? Only time will tell. But in my opinion, Obama is the best choice of Free Liberals at this point. That said, if former Congressman Bob Barr jumps into the race, his candidacy would be catnip to Ron Paul revolutionaries.