According to the latest editorial at National Review Online.

The piece ends, "It will probably be Barr’s fate to be ignored, and those libertarians who care about the credibility of their cause should be glad of it."

Pointing insistently at something while telling everyone to ignore it is an interesting approach. I suppose they mean that, given the information they've just given us about Barr, we should begin to ignore him at the end of the editorial.

It is curious, however, that anyone cares enough about who the Libertarian Party's candidate is to write an editorial about how no one should care. Are we living in the Era of Paul, where libertarianism actually has the power to turn America's collective head (if there were such a thing)?

-MT